Rumpus is unique in that it allows you to choose from three different methods to provide anonymous FTP access, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. These methods are:
However, a purely anonymous site isn't capable of providing users with any other type of access, which is the best way to secure the contents of your server. Another down side to this approach is that even you, the owner of the server will be unable to gain full access the server via FTP.
So, if you need access in addition to providing anonymous FTP access, you'll need to look at the remaining two options.
For details on configuring user permissions using the File Sharing model of the MacOS, see the documentation that came with your Macintosh. A simple tutorial is also provided in this User's Guide, in the section "Adding Users Via File Sharing". You can also read more about how File Sharing security is applied in the "Security Options" section of this manual.
While the MacOS File Sharing model is very flexible, there are a few downsides to providing anonymous FTP access using Users & Groups. First File Sharing requires a substantial amount of your server's CPU, RAM, and other resources, and has a negative impact on performance. Also, standard File Sharing built into the MacOS is limited to 100 user accounts. Finally, because configuration is performed in several different places, setting up and maintaining user accounts can be cumbersome.
In many (if not most) cases, the security model built into Rumpus is easier to configure and maintain, and considerably faster.
Ease of configuration and additional privilege options are major benefits of this model, and the performance improvement can sometimes be very substantial, depending on your server and network. In fact, by allowing you to turn File Sharing off on your server, you will most likely notice an improvement not only in the speed of your FTP access, but other services running on the same computer as well.
Copyright © 1997-9 Maxum Development Corporation
http://www.maxum.com/